The US Constitution



There are two kinds of "great". Dance with the Devil and he will make you great for a season (till God smacks you down) Luke 4:5,6, 5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. 6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it."

Notice, Jesus never said "Oh, you cant deliver all that to me. You dont have that kind of power. No, Jesus recognized that The Father HAD given all this into Satans hand, and it is still true today. The Zionists (who currently control America) HAVE taken Satan up on his offer. Then, on the other hand there is the "great" that comes from being a righteous nation. At times America has done both, walked with God, and danced with the Devil.



The French Historian Alex. DeTocqueville said circa 1835 “America is Great because America is Good”. Meaning Righteous. (go back to the main page HastingsOpen4Business.com and search term "Consider from whence we have fallen". That describes the Fruits of a relatively righteous America, a "great" America.) But that was back then. We are no longer near that righteous today. Now back to our constitution, and what is wrong with it.

The Impossible Clause

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of Religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof



Our Constitution allows for “Freedom of Religion”. That, my friends is IMPOSSIBLE for any judicial system to consistently implement. If I am a Supreme Court Justice, and a devil worshiper takes your young virgin daughter for their Halloween sacrifice, do I allow that under the first amendment. Next, we find that a Jew killed your brother because your brother hit the Jew. The Jew was not injured but according to Sanhedren 58b "If a goy hits a Jew, he must be killed". Do I allow that to go unpunished? Next your Muslim employee has sued you because he took all of the month of Ramadan off to fast and pray, then he insisted on returning to his old job, but you have hired someone else to take his place. Now the case has come up to me upon appeal. Which religion over-rules? I would have ruled on it today, but the hindu sacred cows wandered into the court room and no-one dared shoo them away, and the cows crapped all over the floor, stinking up the entire room. Maybe tomorrow we can hold court, if the cows have wandered off.

If I am a Talmudic Jew and believe it is my duty to steal from, deceive, and kill idolaters like Christians, as my Talmud commands me to do, then I have to be able to do that under the first amendment.

That goes against the Christians who believe that unbelievers should not be killed, but loved into the kingdom and evangelized. But in the mean time, our supposedly RELIGIOUS PLURALITY nation limps along by adopting at least the bare minimum of Christian principles called the 10 commandments (do not steal, do not murder, consider one another better than yourself, and the golden rule, do unto others as you would want them to do unto you).

With all these conflicting religions, the Supreme Court must decide which religion will dominate.

That is NOT freedom of religion for someone. It is time that Americans scrapped the un-workable parts of their constitution and declared America to be a “Christian Republic”.

Consider this logic. In heaven, there is no freedom of religion. Jesus is King. You cant be an atheist, or Hindu or Muslim, and certainly no phony “Jew”, up in heaven. All must be “Christ Followers and Jesus worshipers”.

Objection: Francis, we got along fine with the current constitution for 200 years, I dont think I want to go changing it now. Answer: You got along fine in the early days, because America was vast majority nominally Christian. Today, thanks to Zionist influence and control, we are largely a secular nation, with fewer and fewer Christians.

Add to that the protocols of Zion (playbook of the Zionists) one theme in which is to create religious and racial strife to weaken and bring down the government (once the govt. is in chaos, and riots are happening (which the Zionists have planned for, and financed, and fanned the flames of with their Zionist/CIA controlled Media), and crashed the economy, the people will lose faith in the current government and clamor for order and peace, that is when the Zionist Billionaires will step in with their private armies and restore order, and set up a new government, their messianic Zionist King with ALL nations subservient to fake "Israel" and the fake "Jews").

PROTOCOL No. 17

WE SHALL DESTROY THE CLERGY

2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE "GOYIM," and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.

3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. (Karl Rothschild acted as "peacemaker" between the Vatican and her enemies, loaning the Vatican five million pounds in a period of difficulty. Gregory XVI conferred a Papal decoration on Kalman Rothschild since then Rothschilds have been "Guardians of the Vatican Treasury").

4. THE KING OF THE JEWS WILL BE THE REAL POPE OF THE UNIVERSE, THE PATRIARCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH

5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .

6. In general, then, our contemporary press will continue to CONVICT State affairs, religions, incapacities of the GOYIM, always using the most unprincipled expressions in order by every means to lower their prestige in the manner which can only be practiced by the genius of our gifted tribe . . . e.g. Denying the massacre of the Branch Dravidian sect at Waco, Texas, was a needless and deliberate massacre by the B.A.T.F./F.B.I/C.I.A/U.S. Government).

For the other protocols of Zion go here for hard copy, or here for the mp3, or here for the web page. which is found at http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm

As to who wrote the protocols, and their history, go here, http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=534



Objection: OK, so you said other things were wrong with the constitution. What are these?



Answers:
1) It bars the states from coining money. Then, if the Federal Govt. does not coin money, but instead declares paper currency to be "legal tender", you create a vacuum resulting in NO COINED MONEY. Of course I am not talking about our current clad coins that are relatively worthless, quarters, dimes, nickels.

The Federal Govt. has conveniently gotten us off the gold standard and forbid the states from rectifying the situation. Imagine if Nebraska circulated its own gold and silver coin, and promoted that specie OVER and ABOVE the inflatable FERNS (Federal Reserve Notes) we use today. No county can coin, because counties are creatures of the state.

It is questionable whether Cities can coin, because they are corporations of the state. (This needs to be tested in the courts, perhaps a home-rule city could, or a city that un-incorporates). So, are only private citizens coining their own money and trying to convince everyone else to accept private-citizen dollars, our only way out? How ridiculous! The Feds should NEVER have seized this power ONLY for themselves.



Secondly, the constitution has stripped the states of their power.

It is a contract between the National Govt. and its PEOPLE, just like every other Monopoly or dictatorship. It should have been We the STATES, not We the PEOPLE, entering into the contract. State Governments jealously guard their sovereignty, and have the wealth and can devote mens time to studying every political issue.

Individual men, working 8-10 hours a day just to provide for their family, and pay 1/3rd of their income to all-governments-combined just to pay their taxes, then after a full days work, coming home to do family chores and honey-do's and play with their children and get in a little recreation to keep their sanity, have NO TIME for politics, so the check and balance on the Federal Govt. goes lacking.

The Church also, could hold the Federal Govt. in check, if it ever got it's act together. Then churches could band together for political purposes, and create a party, perhaps called The Christian Commonwealth Party. Which would always take the Biblical stand on every issue. The Church Universal (even Denominations) have the manpower, wealth, and time on their hands to study political issues and recommend Biblical answers. So why dont our pastors do that?

Does the Federal Government have the right to DIRECTLY tax the American people, going around the states, ignoring the current level of state taxation, no matter how high or low? YES IT DOES. This was one of Patrick Henry's objections, he said "but let it (the payment of federal taxes by Virginians) depend upon our (the state governments) own pleasure to pay our money in the most easy manner for our people."

Does this constitution set up another government complete with its own laws, judicial system, federal sheriff, army, etc? YES IT DOES. Well friends, there cannot be two parallel governments concurrently ruling over the people. One MUST have supremacy, whenever the laws of the two collide. Article 6 of the US Constitution says "This constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in persuance thereof and all treaties made or which shall be made under the authority of the United States SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary not withstanding."

Whenever two governments compete for power, unless they be Christian, they will be trying to wipe one another out. And one will succeed, eliminating the check and balance put upon it by the other.

Yes, I hear you argue, that was the weakness of the Articles of Confederation, too much power to the independent states, each going their own way, competing against each other, not getting money and troops to Washington in time, to win a national war, etc.

Well, as Patrick Henry said in his address to the Virginia assembly contemplating ratification of the constitution "The Confederation, this same despised government, merits, in my opinion, the highest encomium: it carried us through a long and dangerous war; it rendered us victorious in that bloody conflict with a powerful nation; it has secured us a territory greater than any European monarch possesses: and shall a government which has been thus strong and vigorous, be accused of imbecility, and abandoned for want of energy? Consider what you are about to do before you part with the government."



Thirdly, It puts the military, and the states militia in the hands of the National Government. Leaving the States defenseless against the National Government.



Fourth, It creates a Federal standing army. This HUGE expense and waste of mens time and resources, INEVITABLY WILL eventually be utilized by constant wars of aggression to make it pay for itself. Which results in Empire building. Which results in other countries having to maintain their own standing armies just for their own national defense against us, which results in the whole world becoming an armed camp.

God hates this. We all could be using all our resources for peaceful invention and scientific progress, but instead we waste a third or so of our national budget on killing each other. The proper alternative to a Federal Standing Army is State Militias which are NOT standing armies but minutemen ready to take up arms FOR DEFENSE, that under go regular military training and drill, but spend the vast majority of their time pursuing their own civilian lives.



Fifth, Presently, US Senators are elected by popularity contests orchestrated by a controlled bought-off media and elected by an ignorant-of-the-issues population who are kept down in such poverty, they have no time to study political issues, nor organize themselves politically into EFFECTIVE parties THAT EFFECTIVELY protect their morals, principles, welfare and prosperity. That would NOT be the current Republican and Democrat parties, which have been infiltrated, and bought off by the Zionist international bankers.



Sixth, Patrick Henry says:
Where is the responsibility?
That leading principle in the British government? In that government, a punishment certain and inevitable is provided; but in this, there is no real, actual punishment for the grossest mal-administration. They may go without punishment, though they commit the most outrageous violation on our immunities. That paper may tell me they will be punished. I ask, By what law? They must make the law, for there is no existing law to do it. What! will they make a law to punish themselves?

This, sir, is my great objection to the Constitution, that there is no true responsibility�and that the preservation of our liberty depends on the single chance of men being virtuous enough to make laws to punish themselves. In the country from which we are descended, they have real and not imaginary responsibility; for the mal-administration has cost their heads to some of the most saucy geniuses that ever were.

The Senate, by making treaties, may destroy your liberty and laws for want of responsibility. Two thirds of those that shall happen to be present, can, with the President, make treaties that shall be the supreme law of the land; they may make the most ruinous treaties; and yet there is no punishment for them. Whoever shows me a punishment provided for them will oblige me.



Seventh, a confederacy of states could work, just look at Switzerland. More from Patrick Henry:

Nine states (out of the 13 colonies) are sufficient to establish this (constitution) government over those nine. Imagine that nine have come into it. (But, let us suppose) Virginia has certain scruples (objections to the Constitution). Suppose she will, consequently, refuse to join with those states (in ratifying the Constitution); may not she still continue in friendship and union with them? If she sends her annual requisitions in dollars, do you think their stomachs will be so squeamish as to refuse her dollars? Will they not accept her regiments?

They would intimidate you into an inconsiderate adoption, and frighten you with ideal evils, (Shays Rebellion had just happened, over 1000 patriots took over a courthouse and Federal Armory, because their land was being confiscated by the new Federal Govt) and that the Union shall be dissolved. 'Tis a bug-bear, sir: the fact is, sir, that the eight adopting states can hardly stand on their own legs. Public fame tells us that the adopting states have already heart-burnings and animosity, and repent their precipitate hurry (in adopting the constitution): this, sir, may occasion exceeding great mischief.

When I reflect on these and many other circumstances, I must think those states will be found to be in confederacy with us. If we pay our quota of money annually, and furnish our ratable number of men, when necessary, I can see no danger from a rejection (of the constitution as far as ratification goes).

The history of Switzerland clearly proves that we might be in amicable alliance with those states without adopting this Constitution. Switzerland is a confederacy, consisting of dissimilar governments. This is an example which proves that governments of dissimilar structures may be confederated. That confederate republic has stood upwards of four hundred years; and, although several of the individual republics are democratic, and the rest aristocratic, no evil has resulted from this dissimilarity; for they have braved all the power of France and Germany during that long period. The Swiss spirit, sir, has kept them together; they have encountered and overcome immense difficulties with patience and fortitude. In the vicinity of powerful and ambitious monarchs, they have retained their independence, republican simplicity, and valor. [Here he makes a comparison of the people of that country and those of France, and makes a quotation from Addison illustrating the subject.]

Comparison to Swiss confederacy of dissimilar states

Look at the peasants of that country and of France; and mark the difference. You will find the condition of the former far more desirable and comfortable. No matter whether the people be great, splendid, and powerful, if they enjoy freedom. The Turkish Grand Signior, alongside of our President, would put us to disgrace; but we should be as abundantly consoled for this disgrace, when our citizens have been put in contrast with the Turkish slave." (end of Patrick Henry's commentary)



But in conclusion.



No form of Government (dictatorship, monarchy, oligarchy, republic, democracy, anarchy) will work on an un-righteous people. The people will turn on themselves and lie, cheat, steal, murder, form competing gangs, etc. and make life hell for each other. In fact, it is Gods righteous judgment on a people that turns their back on Him, that their government become perverted. Conversly, you can make ANY form of Government work, with a righteous people.

So, in a way, it is useless to ponder which form of government is best. It is simply re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Without repentence, why should God grant the gift of good government, peace and prosperity? In fact, you are working AGAINST the plan of God to try to bring the people prosperity (make America Great Again, make Hastings Great, grow Hastings, etc.) without their repentence.

The first order of business, therefore, for the political reformer should be re-establishing the relationship with Almighty God, Providence as the founding fathers called Him. The giver of every good gift, health, life, love, time on this beautiful planet, an eternal afterlife with Him, etc.

Ah, but you say, that is the job of the pastors. Well, what if the pastors are failing at their task? Study history, has a civil magistrate ever called a church council to settle differences between them (Constantine), Samuel was Judge in the land (prior to Sauls Kingship) and demanded repentence before military victory was given, see 1st Samuel 7:3.

In summary

It was not our constitution that made America Great. It was God who did that. Now that we are dancing with the devil, slaughtering millions overseas to build the Zionist Empire, aborting our young, etc. is it any wonder God brings a few judgments (disciplinary actions) down upon us? Phony COVID19, brought on by The prostitute big pharma vaccination profiteers, the billionaire population control guys, and the Zionist news media fanning the flames, are all acting in concert to afflict you with masks, hand washings, social distancing, closed businesses, and soon to be MANDATORY VACCINATIONS.